The Jungle Analogy

In the 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, Dr. Stephen Covey illustrates the role of a leader with the Jungle Analogy.  He talks about a group, an organization, committed to swathing a path through the jungle.  In this organization, he identifies three roles – the machete-wielding worker, the manager and the leader.

While the worker is cutting down the undergrowth, the manager is behind the action making sure the worker is well supported – sharpening machetes, providing training, nutrition, strength building, you could even imagine this manager providing supportive words of encouragement… “Great slash! A couple more like that and you’ll be up for hacker of the year!”

The leader is perched atop a tall tree ensuring direction, and if necessary, yelling “Wrong jungle!”

The lesson Dr. Covey is conveying is about the importance of having someone that is at the highest of high levels thinking about purpose and direction. Another great example he uses is talking about climbing a ladder and the importance of having the ladder up against the correct wall. I’m in wholehearted agreement with the sentiment.

I really like this jungle analogy. When I talk about it, I always attribute more lessons to it than Dr. Covey did. I think this analogy is fantastic for helping us understand our organizations. It simplifies the playing field and allows for a very direct examination and discussion about roles in the workplace.

Here’s my addition to the analogy. I think the Manager feels tremendously inadequate in their role. They’re on the field. They’re in a position to assess and actually provide criticism on the actions of others, however they don’t cut. They don’t participate in the direct purpose of the organization. Seen from the perspective of a hotshot machete worker, they’re a gofer. A waterboy.

For managers, that can weigh heavy, especially since most of them used to be hotshot machete workers. I think these managers have a tremendous internal pressure to pick up a machete and impressively lead the way. Especially consider when one of their machete workers pleadingly looks back at them. “This is a very difficult patch,” they say. What manager could resist the opportunity to show their skill at getting the job done? It’s a moment that allows them to be a hero, is it not?

The moment a manager puts down their clipboard and starts hacking, the organization is gravely injured. When a manager takes on that role on the front lines, all other machete workers are without support. It’s so simple to see in the analogy, so seemingly difficult to see in the office. In the manager’s (selfish) effort to show their ability and see immediate progress, they reduce the capability of everyone else. I’m not sure that’s even the worse part, though. They also teach one machete wielder a very unhelpful lesson – if you find yourself in a challenging spot, look backwards. Rather than taking the time to figure it out, you can count on someone else to do the really hard stuff.

If a manager does their very difficult, emotionally demanding job of not jumping in, they build capability of staff.  They build a more sustainable and healthy organization.

Here’s the assignment. Don’t look for validation through the social mirror, look for it in your own principles. The majority of your colleagues likely won’t be with you, but that’s not the objective. You’re looking for personal satisfaction for a job effectively done. For what it’s worth, I will also be celebrating your courageous choice.

Share

About The Author

Nevin

Other posts by

Author his web site

2 Comments Add Yours ↓

The upper is the most recent comment

  1. Chris #
    1

    Nevin,

    I see this type of manager behaviour on almost a daily basis. It is indeed very difficult for a lot of managers to ‘put down their machetes. They feel inadequate and threatened by this — that somehow their ‘real’ skills will deteriorate. This leads to a lack of delegation and support to the people who should be doing the heavy lifting. It also takes away the drive of these people — why should they lift when someone else will do it?

    Unfortunately, I have seen — at least in my organization — a philosophy of punishing managers who do what they are supposed to be doing and not ‘pick up the machete’. I’ve seen these managers labeled as ‘lazy’ and ‘incompetent’.

    The best technician should not become the manager. The best supporter and coach of people should. Rarely do I see this happen in practice though. It is quite the opposite. Human nature I guess…

  2. Nevin #
    2

    OK, this is visible. It’s visible by you, by me, and by lots of others in our organizations. Why is it so hard to change? How come it’s rewarded?

    Theory A: We’re wrong. Being an uber-machete wielder is actually the assignment. The books are wrong. Covey is wrong. Pick up you machete and get back to work.

    Theory B: We’re right, but the system is immovable and un-changeable. Each individual fears the consequences of speaking truth, so as a group, we remain oppressed. Complain if you must, but pick up your machete.

    Theory C: We’re right and the system needs us to speak up and lead the way out. Challenge convention by stating the truth. Stand by your conviction even if you’re punished for refusing to pick up a machete.

    Guess which one I vote for.



Your Comment